Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 21:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 486354
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-13
While I agree that the iPod was the king of mp3 players, there were a lot of other players that were superior to it, except that the other players weren't tethered to iTunes, so the tech tards didn't know how to use them. Apparently, drag and drop (or better yet, Media Monkey) is too complicated for people to figure out.
So, while the iPod won the mp3 race, it wasn't because of it's superiority, but because of its ability to cater to the lowest common denominator, just like the iPad does. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that, but don't pretend these devices are more than what they actually are.