Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Aug 2011 21:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 486659
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-12
Those reporters don't have a clue about manufacturing nor what a CNC mill actually is nor about the availability of such machines.
I just did a quick web search and found several CNC brands selling, with no back-order notices. These "journalists" can't even be bothered to do a little light research.
If you doubt me, perhaps you would care to make a little wager on the availability of new CNC mills and/or the availability of CNC houses. We can start at USD $1,000.
Do you have any idea how wasteful and toxic it is to machine large runs from metal rather than using a more efficient method, such as injection molding?
Built into Apple's "unibody" manufacturing process is a lot of milling energy expended on each unit and a lot of metal that has to be recycled, requiring more energy.
Not only does milling big pieces of metal in large scale production-runs consume a lot of electricity, it also uses a lot of toxic machining lubricant, that has to be disposed.
Multiply by 20,000 the energy expended by one of these CNC machines plus its waste toxic lubricant, and you have the environmental damage just in the machining step of the process.
Furthermore, to recycle all of the metal shavings generated, energy has to be expended to gather them and package/handle them. Then, the shavings have to be shipped to a foundry, using even more energy.
At the foundry, a lot of additional energy is required to remelt the shavings and to make new ingots.
In addition, please note that this whole process is pre-consumer -- it is additional to and separate from the process of the consumer recycling their end product.
Injection molding plastic requires much less energy than mass machining, and it produces almost no material waste, with no pre-consumer recycling necessary. Most of Apple's competitors use injection molding and fasteners -- much more environmentally friendly.
In regards to plastic looking "like shit," the only time it looks like shit is when it is used on Apple products!
I have no idea what is selling at Amazon, but more non-Apple laptops are sold, compared to the number of Apple laptops sold.
I do not pretend to know the interests nor motivations of PC makers, nor would I praise Apple for price gouging.