Linked by umad on Thu 25th Aug 2011 22:51 UTC
Permalink for comment 487032
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-08-22
Well, TFA suggests that if Apple did not have to compete with Windows then they would have lowered their prices...however, even today in markets where Apple is the dominant (or considered the dominant) player, they still maintain the higher prices - one need only look at the iPad, iPod, and iPhone to see this.
Then again, they'll probably make the same accusation regarding iPad/iPhone and Android.
Yes, Apple will eventually be marginalized back to the niche it has always had when it comes to the phone and tablet markets - Android will be the benefactor. Not because Android is better than iOS, but because everyone else will be using it since Apple won't license out iOS.
Apple nearly went under when they tried to offer clones of the Mac as everyone else was able to undercut their pricing. But that's not because Apple is a software company that happens to make hardware (like Microsoft), but because at the heart of it Apple is a hardware company that happens to make software - more like IBM, Dell, and HP in that respect.