Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 26th Aug 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by Morgan
Permalink for comment 487289
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-18
1. he hosted files on the German FreeNet system, which is a filehosting site, such as Tucows and many others
Check the netcraft report of codecpack.nl. It was and is hosted on a server colocated at LeaseWeb, a Dutch colocator. As both the e-mail message and the archive.org cache indicates, the files were hosted on codecpack.nl. Hence, the files were hosted by a server in the Netherlands. Not in Germany.
It is, if it contains DLLs which he is not allowed to redistribute.
That's certainly possible. However, he did announce new versions.
It's all smokes and mirrors. The people arguing this was just simple linking, and no hosting, have never shown any proof. This while all the evidence shows he hosted the files, and as such redistributes DLLs that were property of Real Networks.
At the same time, there is a whole lot of bad journalism without fact checking.
Edited 2011-08-27 22:46 UTC