Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Aug 2011 21:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 487433
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-18
As a stunt, making a "$25 computer" is cool and all, but it will take a lot more to make a functional computer and those extra parts cost the same as they do for a traditional computer.
Yes, it's a cheap motherboard, so you save a bit building a fully functional computer, but you don't save all that much. You can get a functional AMD motherboard + GPU + CPU for $70, and that motherboard will include things like SATA ports, and more than one USB port - not to mention about 4x the CPU power.
The ability to power the motherboard from non-traditional power sources is neat and all, but show me a monitor that runs on 4 AAs.
Edited 2011-08-29 08:36 UTC