Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 31st Aug 2011 19:42 UTC
Windows Over the past few days, Microsoft has been talking about improvements made to Windows 8 on its 'Building Windows 8' blog at MSDN. Strangely enough, the improvements mentioned were either dealing with the classic desktop, or were demonstrated using the classic desktop - and not the fancy Metro user interface which is supposed to be Windows 8's big new thing. Today's post finally gives a little more detail about how the classic and Metro UI work together, but questions still remain.
Permalink for comment 487958
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Microsoft's Daft Prices
by Richard Dale on Thu 1st Sep 2011 16:23 UTC
Richard Dale
Member since:

On Dell's Spanish website a copy of Windows 7 Home Premium costs 197 euros, and a copy of Windows 7 Ultimate cost 311 euros. You can actually buy quite a nice computer for the cost of these OS's. A Dell netbook or a Zino are priced about the same as Home Premium and Ultimate respectively, even though they include a Microsoft OS. An upgrade to Windows 7 Home Premium, where you already own a copy of an older Windows, even costs 125 euros. Or if you have a Dell netbook with Windows 7 Starter it will cost you 82 euros to upgrade to Home Premium.

Obviously tablets are very price sensitive, and if they cost 100-300 euros more than they otherwise would, then people won't buy them. If your tablet drops into something as ugly as the proposed new Windows 8 Explorer UI, then people won't buy them either, even if they cost as little as a Meego/Android/Plasma Active tablet without that extra 100-300 euros Microsoft tax.

I can only see the combination in Windows 8, of Windows Phone 7 Metro style and Windows 7 'ugly style' as a way of holding up revenues. It doesn't appear to be something anyone other than Microsoft would want to have. I just don't understand how Microsoft is charging more for their OSs than they were a few years ago when the hardware was nearly 10 times as expensive. It only works if they have a monopoly as they do for pre-installed desktop OSs. But they don't have a monopoly on tablets, and I just don't see how they can possibly get away with charging the same money for a tablet OS as they do for a desktop OS.

Reply Score: 1