Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Sep 2011 21:47 UTC
Apple So, I kind of mocked this story yesterday, but today an interesting twist has emerged which puts the story in an entirely different light. This week, CNet reported a story about how Apple is working with the San Francisco Police Department to retrieve a lost iPhone 5 prototype. The police and Apple apparently traced the phone to someone's house, and showed up on his doorstep, threatening him and his family. The only problem - the SFPD has no record of any house search or of the case in general - raising the question whether Apple employees falsely impersonated the SFPD, which happens to be a serious crime in California. Update: While I was busy sleeping, the story changed a little bit, but it's still far too shady. After conferring with Apple, the SFPD now states four police officers were involved, and that only the two Apple employees entered Calderon's house. However, Calderon had no idea these two were private non-police people, since he claims they did not identify themselves as Apple employees. Had he known, he would not have let them search his house. So, update or no, Apple employees still impersonated police officers, and issued threats to intimidate Calderon into letting them search his house - without a warrant. I don't understand how people can just accept this sort of behaviour. Don't you have rights in the US? Update II: Perfect summary.
Permalink for comment 488427
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I have a bone to pick with any company that does this sort of crazy shit. I've written countless similar stories about Microsoft, for instance, or Oracle, and Google, too.

YOU are the one with the Apple fixation, since YOU only see the Apple stories on this site. You have barely EVER made a non-Apple comment. So, who's the one fixated on Apple here? Me, who has posted more than 10000 stories (excl. comments!), of which 99% are NOT about Apple - or you, who has never posted a comment NOT about Apple?

Sorry, but I think you might require a few glances in the mirror.

Reply Parent Score: 3