Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 6th Sep 2011 21:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 489043
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
There are virtual network operators in addition to the big ones, aren't there? The network owners compete on network coverage, signal quality and price, while the virtual operators compete mostly on price, making sure there is a significant market for the end user. Having more than a handful redundant networks does not really sound necessary as long as the market regulation ensures virtual operators can exist as well.
There is a list of US MVNOs at the bottom of the following article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_virtual_network_operator