Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Sep 2011 15:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 489082
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-12-10
Another new version of Windows, another new promise of faster boot up times. I thought you had used Windows long enough to notice the scam by now, Thom.
Notice how they are improving the part of boot-up that is not really truly the problem with Windows. It is all the disk trashing that goes on when you log on along with their brain-dead FIFO I/O system that causes people to count boot-up times in minutes on budget computers.
Basically what is happening is that all disk access is serialized in the kernel without any regard to what process is doing the request. This means that if you have just a few background processes using the disk, the kernel buffers are filled with that and the 1 KB file the user is waiting for now takes 5 seconds to fetch.
Nothing they have announced here addresses the real problem (poorly designed I/O priority and that countless apps all start at the same time) and so the next version of Windows will effectively boot just as slow as the last one did on budget PCs.