Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Sep 2011 00:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 489951
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-09
arch does not need mass adoption. it functions with a few contributors due to its simplicity.
one can use the distro he likes, and does not have to like arch cause "its getting more attention these days"
which is cool. personally i didnt like arch until they fixed most things (arch has some years behind its belt now). whats cool is how they kept it simple at the same time, so far