Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Sep 2011 00:19 UTC
Linux "Many Linux distributions have taken the path of easy GUI-based installation, in order to appeal to a broader mix of users. But not Arch Linux, which emphasises simplicity of technical complexity over general usability. Richard Hillesley explains."
Permalink for comment 490000
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Don´t get it.
by porcel on Sun 18th Sep 2011 11:23 UTC
Member since:

I have read this whole thread and many others and have a hard time figuring out the appeal of distributions such as Arch.

Don´t want a GUI? Install (k)ubuntu from the alternate CD.

Want to know how the system works and how init scripts /upstart works?

Read the docs, visit the largest linux forums or irc. It´s all out there and you benefit from the brainpower of a large community, lots of how-tos, and lots of testing if you are using one of the stable (LTS) releases.

But hey, whatever makes you tick is fine by me. It´s just that the technical arguments rarely seem to wash. I am interested in getting a system that is stable up and running in less than an hour. Two kids and a wife will do that to you.

Edited 2011-09-18 11:24 UTC

Reply Score: 1