Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Sep 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by kragil
Permalink for comment 490283
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
"Anti-user" is any feature that is part of a product that is there only because it benefits the vendor, not the user.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damaged_good
"In economics, a damaged good (sometimes termed "crippleware" or product with "anti-features") is a good that has been deliberately limited in performance, quality or utility, typically for marketing reasons as part of a strategy of product differentiation."
Microsoft's "Geuniune Advantage" euphamism is an absolute classic example. This did absolutely nothing for users except lock some of them out and require some people to purchase new copies of software they had already bought.
Here is another example of a different flavour:
http://www.osnews.com/comments/25175
Microsoft's "Windows 7 Starter" is a similar (although not as drastic) example where Microsoft take a reasonable OS and then go out of their way to cripple it. It actually costs Microsoft more to produce such a version which has the express aim to give users less functionality.
Anti-user. QED.
Edited 2011-09-21 23:39 UTC