Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Sep 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by kragil
Permalink for comment 490316
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-19
Could someone in the know explain the 'Windows Logo Programme'? It's in my limited understanding that signed bootloaders is a prerequisite for showing the 'Windows compatible' logo, not a prerequisite for getting an OEM licence to put Windows on your products.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Also, I hate this attitude of 'it'll be hacked anyway'. It took years for the current crop of consoles to be reliably compromised (not counting Wii) , there's plenty of phones that still haven't been cracked, even after years on the market and there's plenty of DRM'd media that hasn't been cracked. It's not a sure thing, not even close and the extra barriers to entry this presents, even if cracked, could prove enough to just about kill enthusiast computing.