Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Sep 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by kragil
Permalink for comment 490341
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
"I repeat, it is not possible to put malware into a product using an open source development process."
I really don't want to make a fuss here, but this is the kind of overstated claim that does not take into account all of the possibilities. Could you use less absolute terminology, or at least more qualifiers?
I absolutely think you need to come up with some way that it would be possible, or even remotely feasible, before you start having a "holier than thou" go at someone else.
The whole point of open source is that it is a collaboration, a meritocracy. Lots of solutions are proposed and tried, and the best solution, as agreed by consensus amongst the community of developers, is adopted.
You come along and make an absolutely outrageous claim that this process can be corrupted by malware, in plain sight of everyone. You make this claim despite the fact that amongst thousands of open source projects across many years, it never has happened.
Then somehow you think I am the one who should pull my head in?
Unbelievable! Unmitigated gall. Utter balderdash.
Edited 2011-09-22 10:31 UTC