Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Sep 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by kragil
Windows After the walled garden coming to the desktop operating system world, we're currently witnessing another potential nail in the coffin of the relatively open world of desktop and laptop computing. Microsoft has revealed [.pptx] that as part of its Windows 8 logo program, OEMs must implement UEFI secure boot. This could potentially complicate the installation of other operating systems, like Windows 7, XP, and Linux.
Permalink for comment 490345
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by ronaldst
by Alfman on Thu 22nd Sep 2011 10:39 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by ronaldst"
Alfman
Member since:
2011-01-28

Tony Swash,

"I don't know much or care much about UEFI secure boot in Windows 8 and clearly it's possible to facilitate the installation of alternative operating systems via UEFI as Apple did with the Mac but 'anti-user'?

It's worth remembering that 99% of users want stuff that works out of the box, they don't want to be system integrators..."

I think we all get this. But the question is why was it engineered to take power away from the owners? This is not a necessary element of secure boot. Even if 99% of users never need to touch it, why prohibit them from doing so if they want to use it with their own code? That's the problem that we/I have.

Reply Parent Score: 6