Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Sep 2011 22:06 UTC, submitted by kragil
Permalink for comment 490362
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-09
Nope.
You'll be right if the logo says "Designed exclusively for Windows 8".
But it's not. And, though, one can expect it could run *something else*, too.
The exclusive semantic is what's matter here.
And consumer should be able to know it's not a versatile computer but a Windows 8 only computer he's buying. And it should know it *before* doing it.
Otherwise, there's valid legal ground to sue the seller whose hide you it was not a Personal *Computer* but a *Windows 8 device*.
Considering prior tracks of personal computers sales, consumer is legitimate to think that any device sold under this product family "name" is a versatile computer, not a lock-down computing device.
Edited 2011-09-22 13:48 UTC