Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:22 UTC, submitted by kragil
Windows The story about how secure boot for Windows 8, part of UEFI, will hinder the use of non-signed binaries and operating systems, like Linux, has registered at Redmond as well. The company posted about it on the Building Windows 8 blog - but didn't take any of the worries away. In fact, Red Hat's Matthew Garrett, who originally broke this story, has some more information - worst of which is that Red Hat has received confirmation from hardware vendors that some of them will not allow you to disable secure boot.
Permalink for comment 490539
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
open efi etc
by der_FuX on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 23:34 UTC
der_FuX
Member since:
2011-09-23

Selling a device that allows other people to decide what you do with your hardware. Not very original, we've seen this before. The PC platform loses a lot of its freedom should this move not be countered by legislative powers. I live in the EU and certainly hope that secure boot - with its announced weaknesses (sadly some people actually refer to these as "features" (and get away with it) ) - will be "banned".

The guys at coreboot.org certainly saw this coming though. Might be an idea to put this "army of hackers" - that Tsuroerusu referred to - on designing / improving a BSD/GPL licensed EFI that is vastly superior (the BIOS powers of old aren't that well known for their interfaces / features etc.) to this closed, mysterious and frightening code that will be running on a lot of machines.

BTW: I would love to encounter an error message whilst installing Linux/FreeBSD on a piece of new hardware, calling the supplier and telling him his server is broken ;) . Ofc, professional server manufacturers would want their devices to be "safe" as well, wouldn't they ;) ?

Reply Score: 2