Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Sep 2011 22:22 UTC, submitted by kragil
Permalink for comment 490699
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
And when asked...
Mathew Garrett just responds with:
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/5850.html?thread=151258#cmt151258
So there you have it. If it was MS behaving like this, everyone would say it's all pure, unadulterated FUD. But of course, we're talking about open source guys here, so even if it's a company with an obligation to their shareholders, they can do no wrong, they'd never do something out of self-interest. Right?
If Red Hat is so interested about competition, perhaps they shouldn't have abandoned the desktop market when they did. I don't recall anyone locking them out through the use of signing keys back then.
Edited 2011-09-25 09:25 UTC