
So, the hearing about the supposed FRAND status of the three 3G patents Samsung is asserting against Apple in The Netherlands is under way. Samsung is currently pleading, and they claim that Apple has wilfully and systematically infringed these patents. They further state that Apple has refused to license the patents since the introduction of the iPhone 3G, even though Samsung offered licenses. As usual,
WebWereld's Andreas Udo de Haes is
covering the proceeding live on Twitter (in English).
Update: Samsung
offered two FRAND license options (per-patent and as a package deal). Apple declined. Apple also
refused to sign an NDA, delaying negotiations (all according to Samsung, of course).
Update II: Apple retort: we
only buy chips from Intel, and they have a license. Second, Apple
claims Samsung didn't demand a license until 2010.
Update III: Massive Apple fail: lawyer
reveals the percentage Samsung is demanding for its patents - this is
highly confidential information.
Update IV: If Apple can convince the judge of
this one... Ouch!
Member since:
2011-08-18
I dare you to point to anything in the universe and tell me it isn't math.
This whole argument that software patents ought not be defensible because you ought not be able to patent mathematical figures is stupid. It's an argument on the EXACT same understanding that people ought not be able to copyright books because all of it is just letters and you ought not be able to copyright the alphabet.
Thanks. That is probably the most eloquently stated retort on this subject displayed on this site.
Thom is just showing what he hopes will happen and stating it as fact thereby throwing any remaining understanding of journalistic integrity out the window for this one as he appears to not want Apple to succeed if it means that others can't copy them.
EXACTLY