Linked by David Adams on Thu 29th Sep 2011 23:47 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Permalink for comment 491263
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
If your point was that there are a large number of freedom software apps that work equally well on Linux or Windows, then no you don't need to go further, that is a given.
What is your point here, however? The apps do work on Linux desktops.
These are all fine points, and perfectly true. It is great that I can run great Linux applications in such an environment.
The problem is I suppose that most people would see these as features of the OS, rather than as desktop applications.
Edited 2011-09-30 03:21 UTC