Linked by David Adams on Thu 29th Sep 2011 23:47 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Permalink for comment 491581
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-10
I do not get your argument. What does a great music player like foobar2000 on Windows take away from a great music player like Amarok on Linux?
Why is the number of available configuration options and features the main metric for how good a player is?
In your mind, is there a killer feature in foobar2000 that completely changes the listening experience and which is not available in a Linux music player?