Linked by David Adams on Mon 3rd Oct 2011 17:33 UTC, submitted by Adurbe
Legal Apple has the right to continue restricting its operating systems to its own hardware thanks to a decision handed down by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday. Circuit Judge Mary Schroeder wrote in her opinion that Apple's Mac OS X licensing agreement was indeed enforceable against Psystar, which had sold non-Mac computers with Mac OS X installed.
Permalink for comment 491709
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
BlueofRainbow
Member since:
2009-01-06

This is a fine line.

A hacker/hobbyist can build his/her own Hackintosh with off-the self components and a purchased copy of OS X. This is not quite abiding to the full EULA but it would be difficult for Apple to enforce the EULA other than by barring the Hackintosh systems from updates/upgrades via hardware checks during their install.

However, what Psystar did was - take such off-the self components, install OS X, and sale the completed package to end-users in the hope of profits. Two key-concepts - a complete package and in the hope of profits - makes it difficult not to side with Apple.

Had Psystar sold hardware which could easily be transformed into a Hackintosh, then they possibly would not (could not) have been stopped from doing so even if a list of OS X versions which could be installed on them (compatibility) was provided as part of a Welcome Manual, along with similar notes for Linux and Windows.

Reply Parent Score: 1