Linked by David Adams on Mon 3rd Oct 2011 17:33 UTC, submitted by Adurbe
Legal Apple has the right to continue restricting its operating systems to its own hardware thanks to a decision handed down by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday. Circuit Judge Mary Schroeder wrote in her opinion that Apple's Mac OS X licensing agreement was indeed enforceable against Psystar, which had sold non-Mac computers with Mac OS X installed.
Permalink for comment 491733
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: It's their OS
by jimmy1971 on Tue 4th Oct 2011 00:00 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: It's their OS"
jimmy1971
Member since:
2009-08-27

No, I never said EULA's are not legally-enforceable. I said -- as you quoted me -- that it's how effectively they can be enforced that matters.

As I mentioned earlier, the decision of the courts doesn't restrict individual users from putting OS X on non-Apple hardware. (Assuming the author of the arstechnica.com writer has it right.)

So...it is absolutist (or at least over-simplified) to say that EULA's are legally-enforceable. Dig it: companies are free to write EULAs, users are free to disobey said EULA's, and companies are then in turn free to test the EULA's in court.

May the most expensive legal team win.

Edited 2011-10-04 00:02 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1