Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Oct 2011 13:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 491798
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-10
And like I said, given our current state of laws, this is hardly a big deal.
"As the study points out, encouraging the 'cooperation' between internet providers and the content industry amounts to privatized policing"
Encouraging cooperation? Privatized policing is everywhere... private security guards at events, private security at homes and malls.
"ACTA also allows for the monitoring of internet users without initial suspicion"
And what about speed cameras, DUI check points...
"The agreement does not contain 'fair use' clauses or exceptions for trivial or minimal infringements."
Governments love banning things. Everything from cigarettes, to marijuana, to guns, to transfats...
"Overall, ACTA tilts the balance of IPR protection manifestly unfairly towards one group of beneficiaries of the right to property, IP right holders, and unfairly against others"
Isn't this pretty much what most laws do? Pit one group against another. Public sector union negotiations tip the balance of power to the public sector unions against the rights and property of the general population.
These laws just aren't that out there... especially when you consider the general state of affairs in the EU.