Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Oct 2011 13:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 491955
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
Remember all those cease-and-desist and 'pay us $2,000, and we won't file suit against you' letters? The evidence was collected privately. And, as long as people are part of public networks, that aspect of policing isn't going away anytime soon. The difference, I think, is that this law aims to make it easier for the police to target and extract compensation/punishment from/for people.
Look, I know that we all don't want a Big Brother state. But, when the shit hits the proverbial fan -- and if this law ever sees the light of day -- it's primarily going to be an issue for the great unwashed among us who have no idea how to anonymize ourselves properly. That doesn't mean I'm in favor of this law. I'm not. But there are always countermeasures, and that's what it might come down to...