Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Oct 2011 13:31 UTC
Legal A few days ago, several countries signed ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. As you are probably aware, ACTA was drafted up in secret, and is basically Obama/Biden's attempt to impose the US' draconian pro-big business/big content protection laws on the rest of the world ('sign it, or else'). The European Parliament still has to vote on it, and as such, Douwe Korff, professor of international law at the London Metropolitan University, and Ian Brown senior research fellow at the University of Oxford, performed a 90-page study, with a harsh conclusion: ACTA violates fundamental human rights.
Permalink for comment 492095
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Call me contrarian...
by lemur2 on Thu 6th Oct 2011 06:14 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Call me contrarian..."
Member since:

the copy protection used in DVD encyption is Content Scramble System (aka CSS) and is licensed to venders for use in DVD player hardware and software from the DVD Forum. They are a collection of companies who designed and setup the DRM (CSS) for use with DVDs in the first place. The cost is $10-15. The (Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) for the USA members here, forbids VLC from playing DVDs. Legally, if you are in the USA and use VLC to play a whole movie you are doing something illegal because you don't have a license to play DVDs. That license does NOT come as part of a DVD disc. Of course, USA laws don't apply to everyone else, regardless of if the DVD Forum is made up of company around the world. Lastly, VideoLAN and who created the libdvdcss that VLC uses, is a French non-profit organization and there is nothing the USA can do about that with the DMCA.

The DMCA is the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. It is meant to prevent copying of copyrighted works, it is NOT meant as a means to enforce collection of bogus fees-for-use.

VLC does not use the software from the the DVD Forum, therefore there is no need to purchase a $10-$15 licesne from the DVD Forum to run VLC.

There was a case of a printer manufacturer who tried to put "copy protection" into prinetr ink cartridges, and then to charge users a premium price for printer ink catridges. A competing firm made cheaper ink cartridges for that printer, and the printer firm sued, claiming a DMCA violation. It went to court, the printer firm lost.

The DMCA is NOT a law for enforcing collection of license fees or locking other products out of markets or locking people into expensive support, it is strictly for the protection of copyrighted works.

Reply Parent Score: 3