Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th Oct 2011 18:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 493501
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
Maybe it's because the specs of the phone where already known, but 1.2GHz dual core is already here in other phones, and the camera have to prove itself. The display is the interesting bit, and this is Samsung so display will be good.
On the other hand I found Android 4.0 quite interesting. Really polished and smooth. And that's only the UI. On the technical side they have a lot of new stuff. Direct WiFi, Android Beam, much better browser (capable of using the two cores), more integration APIs, new settings, face unlock, built-in picture editor, hardware accelerated UI, almost real-time speech recognition. And they haven't said anything about low level details related to Davlik or OS improvements. I'm expecting this Android version ported to Intel CPUs and with a faster JIT. The tech details said they have better "mouse" handling, so I expect it running on laptops and netbooks one of this days.
I think this Android version is really good every way you look at it. We have to wait and see if it's buggy or solid. But I'm sure Google will take care of any problem in the next months, and for Google IO 2012 we will have a rock solid 4.1.
Of course naysayers will say it's all wrong and ugly and slow. But that's expected.
And this guy Mathias, he is good!