Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Oct 2011 22:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 494144
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-04-10
Particularly against obvious stupidity. Software patents are so logically and profoundly repugnant that anybody with even a lower primate level of intelligence should be able to understand and also logically infer an intense bias against them.
But don't take my word for it. Give old Ben a try:
"... as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously."
Ben Franklin was much, much smarter than anybody I know of today, or even any of his contemporaries. Arguing against him would be insane. This is doubly true in a system where corporations can enter litigation as if they were people.