Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Oct 2011 22:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 494210
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
You also make no effort to show ANY respect to any opposing opinions, you frequently denigrate other journalists and bloggers, and you make personal attacks against your readers in response to perfectly legitimate comments.
This is, of course, provably nonsense. If I really were as hostile and evil as you make it out to be, OSNews wouldn't be filled to the brim with people who disagree with me.
If someone's an Apple fanatic, I see absolutely zero reason not to simply say so. There's nothing wrong about being called a 'fanatic' - it's not a negative label at all. It just means you're enthusiastic about something, a fan of something. You can call me a Metro fanatic or BeOS fanatic or Windows NT fanatic or microkernel fanatic every time of the day. I don't care.
I also don't think someone like lemur2 would object to being labelled a KDE or open source fanatic - it's a very apt description of the kinds of views that he holds. It's not a negative judgement at all. It seems like only a small number of Apple fanatics take issue with being labelled fanatics - well, that's your problem, not mine.