Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Oct 2011 10:32 UTC
Permalink for comment 494486
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
There's no feature parity there.
These are it's competitors. What you linked is closer to the Lumia 710, which has a similar price tag.
http://thisismynext.com/2011/10/26/nokia-lumia-800-vs-iphone-4s-htc...
That article doesn't talk about hardware specs, sorry but you something better to support your point.
Maybe you should check the Lumia 800 specs before putting it into same class as iPhone or recent Android phones: 800x480 pixel resolution, single core CPU, only 512 MB RAM, no NFC, dull software, ... that's definitely just middle class in October 2011. Only feature that slightly puts the phone out of that class is the camera.