Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Oct 2005 19:47 UTC, submitted by Gsurface
Permalink for comment 49467
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
Excellent question. I wonder that too... part of what has made FireFox such an excellent and popular product is the modularity of it with extensions. This enabled the user to install and remove features, which was a big change from the other more 'bloated' Mozilla browsers, think Netscape. Once upon a time Netscape was just a browser, and then it got stuffed with features that some say over complicated simple browsing... which paved way for FireFox.
So why go and do that all over again?
A built in blogging tool, RSS, and 'search' functionality of the history on top of a new theme seems all stuff that coulda been simply extensions... but hey that's just me.