Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Oct 2011 22:24 UTC
Google "As an online discussion about iOS vs. Android grows longer, the probability of someone bringing up this link approaches 1." The argument goes that before the iPhone, Android looked like a BlackBerry clone, and after the iPhone, it suddenly turned into an iOS clone. While this argument, with its pictures, is snappy and easily digestible, it doesn't actually seem to be supported by the facts.
Permalink for comment 494805
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: iOS not flexible?
by boldingd on Fri 28th Oct 2011 22:42 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: iOS not flexible?"
Member since:

That said, my understanding is that Android contains little of GNU/Linux beyond the Linux kernel, with freshly-written services, device drivers, etc. on top of it -- much like WebOS. iOS, on the other hand, contains much more of OSX than XNU. I'm not sure of that, though; I'm inferring from what I've read.

So far as I know, that is not correct; my understanding was that iOS didn't share much more with desktop OS X than the kernel, pretty much like Android and Linux. I think Apple originally claimed that they where closely related, but I think they baked off of that pretty quickly. Which kinda makes sense, since I personally doubt that you really could design a userspace that'd work well both on smart phones and desktop systems; the things that make for a good userspace in each case are just too different.

Which on a totally different topic is why I'm extremely dubious of what I'm hearing about Windows 8; I just don't think the things that make for a good phone userspace make a good desktop userspace or vice-versa.

Edited 2011-10-28 22:43 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3