Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 31st Oct 2011 12:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 495554
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-05-03
Microsoft has tried to implement a lock-down like this every few years. Past attempts include: Palladium, NGSCB (Next Generation Secure Computing Base), TPM (Trusted Platform Module), and Trustworthy Computing.
The question is whether the computer industry will fight back successfully against this effort as it has against past efforts.
My guess is Yes. While the OEM's are under Microsoft's monopolistic thumb, it is so important to them to keep their options open for alternative sales that they will risk Microsoft's ire and keep their systems open through a BIOS switch. (Of course users will have to be sophisticated enough to go into the config panels to change it...)