Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Nov 2011 19:34 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Permalink for comment 495855
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-06
So far you are the only one constantly bringing up that conspiracy theory.
It's all about potential OEM laziness over the implementation of a MS specification that doesn't consider whether other OSes might be able to boot (and why should they require anything else, they are in the business of selling their own OS).
Would MS love seeing competing operating systems locked out (or at least inconvenienced) out of PCs? Certainly, but that doesn't make it a conspiracy, they aren't actively pushing that with SecureBoot.
Seriously, as someone posted above, complaining about RedHat & Co. trying to make sure that OEMs will implement SecureBoot properly so their operating systems will boot with zero problems is lame.