Linked by David Adams on Sun 6th Nov 2011 04:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 496168
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-01-07
It makes the move unecessary.
There are enormous economies of scale at play in Windows.
By the time product reaches retail shelves, the OEM Windows system install is - for all practical purposes - free.
Walmart.com sells a 3.4 GHz i7 desktop wth 16 GB RAM and a 2 TB HDD for $1000.
A beast like this running Win 7 is a damn capable machine at a mass-market price. It will be easy to secure and easy to manage no matter how often the geek pretends otherwise.
23" monitor included.
After-market sales of hardware, software, accessories and services are huge.
There is no dual inventory and support structure to maintain.
This why the geek goes into cardiac arrest when anyone mentions "secure booting."
The only leverage he has to drive adoption of Linux is affordable commodity PC hardware.