Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Nov 2011 22:56 UTC, submitted by Dart
Permalink for comment 496218
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-05-12
This is *really good stuff* by the Mint team!
The way that the Mint team have approached this is *exactly* how the Gnome devs should have done it.
Mint is focused on "how can we make things better for users?" Gnome is focused on "how can we make things better for *devs*?"
I don't think there has ever been a more poorly-managed process than the Unity release, with Gnome's take-it-or-leave-it attitude to users. Mint deserve all the kudos in the world for what they are doing.
Final comment - if, by some chance, the Mint work ends up folded into the Ubuntu codebase, that will prove that Mint's approach was right all along.