Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Nov 2011 21:26 UTC, submitted by edwin
Permalink for comment 496892
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-24
I know that Minix is a more complex and feature-rich OS (not in the least because it's capable of production use), but other than this, can someone tell me what differences it has architecturally compared to Xv6?
Also, I'm wondering why they didn't just use an older, smaller version of Minix since Tanenbaum *did* write it originally as a teaching OS.