Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Nov 2011 21:26 UTC, submitted by edwin
Permalink for comment 496949
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
The argument that updating a library will fix the bug in all programs that dynamically link said library goes both ways; breaking the library also beaks all programs at the same time.
And if security is a high priority, you should be aware that dynamic linking has some potential risks on its own. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is a rather dangerous thing, especially when combined with a suid root binary.