Linked by lemur2 on Tue 8th Nov 2011 22:40 UTC
Permalink for comment 497020
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-13
They're working fine here. I'm only using 6, and all 6 of them are working perfectly well in the FF 9 beta I'm running.
This is the norm, not an exception - the new rolling release schedule means that extensions should remain compatible between releases and the automatic testing/compatibility version bumping Mozilla does ensures that extensions don't get left behind.
Also, I have to respond to this assertion that somehow Firefox is less secure now because of the more frequent releases. That's dumb, the opposite is true. They are incorporating all the security fixes the old browser had into the new releases, and by making it a moving target hackers have less time to find holes than they did before. As long as you stay up to date with the latest version, you'll be fine. Sticking with an old version is no different that sticking with 3.6.0 instead of updating to 3.6.1 when it came out.
Edited 2011-11-12 05:27 UTC