Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Nov 2011 21:32 UTC, submitted by cristoper
Permalink for comment 497172
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-25
I want Haiku to succeed if for no other reason that it gives users another lightweight OS option that really does not exist at the moment. OS's like Be, Haiku, and AROS drive innovation in ways that Redmond and Cuppertino just do not "get it" anymore. Cutting edge hardware removes the need for coders to work efficiently and give rise to enormous bloat of Win7 and OS X.
My 2004 vintage Evo still runs XP just fine but there is no upgrade path using Microsoft products that fit this old laptop. So, it now sports Xubuntu and perks along briskly. In truth I would be just as happy running any of the OS's I previously mentioned, I have used them all before and would continue to do so if they do the job. I do not need all the effing eye-candy that so many current TPM's feel compelled to spec as required features.
And yes I do have a fondness for all the OS's mentioned and a few more as well, like IRIX and AIX. I admire them for the work that they allowed me to do and isn't that what it's all about?