Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 21st Nov 2011 07:48 UTC
Permalink for comment 497845
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
Eh, not really. For one, if a cracker has gotten in to your system you have bigger problems than your MAC address being loosely tied to a physical location (that may, or may not, be correct).
Secondly, in order for the MAC address information to be remotely useful to the attacker he'll have first actually break into your system to even get your MAC address. Unless of course he's in your immediate area in which case he can figure this out all by himself without the assistance of Google.
To everyone else all they'll know is that there is an accesspoint named X that MAC address Y has used at some point in time. There's no way to actually relate that MAC address or BSSID to your person.
The dangers of this thing is a bit overstated. It's not like rogue hackers somewhere will magically gain control of your life and threaten world peace by knowing your BSSID and MAC.
We can probably expect this scenario to show up in a cheesy and technically incorrect Hollywood movie any time soon. It will probably star Lorenza Lamas.