Linked by Howard Fosdick on Wed 23rd Nov 2011 07:20 UTC
Permalink for comment 498090
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
See my post above. 32-bit minimal OSes certainly have their place, just not necessarily on one's main desktop.
For example, I have a Wyse x86-based thin client that is quite efficient and useable with Tiny Core Linux installed to the 32MB internal Flash chip, and a USB drive for storage. It's a great media server but it would also do well as a general purpose second machine or as a fallback when the main rig dies. It's portable enough to take to someone else's house and attach an existing keyboard, mouse and monitor for a nice web browsing machine without the risks involved in borrowing their machine for the duration.
Apart from CPU-intensive tasks, there really are very few things it can't do compared to a modern 64-bit system. Yet if I had the "nothing but 64 bits" mentality it would have ended up in the trash heap a long time ago. Thanks to TCL it continues to serve a purpose.