Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Nov 2011 21:39 UTC
Permalink for comment 498099
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-06
It is an undeniable reality that the use of proprietary software is inescapably connected to wealth inequality. And it's also an undeniable reality that our world is currently full of profound inequalities that are far from inevitable.
Essentially our disagreement comes down to this: you by and large support actively existing arrangements, and I don't. That is the crux of the argument.
In social psychology there is a large body of work that has delved into the kinds of processes and conditions that are associated with those who justify existing systems of inequality. It's highly likely you and I score very differently with respect to indices like social dominance orientation, and possibly right wing authoritarianism.