Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Nov 2011 22:07 UTC, submitted by Nooone
Permalink for comment 498331
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-06-02
I can give you a few tips as to why Debian is not the hottie you think it is.
- Excessive -dev packages. They shouldn't even exist. These were the days of 1GB hard drives?
- Too long cycle release. A Linux distro must be neither too hot or too cold. It's gotta have balance. If stable is too old, what's the point if I want a new software feature?
- Torvalds himself points it as "pointless exercise".
- Debian is a stupid name, too. Mix of Deborah and Ian? Oh give me a break!
But I will give you the stability credit. But RHEL and clones are on par with it.