Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Nov 2011 22:07 UTC, submitted by Nooone
Permalink for comment 498348
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-11
All you did was list why you don't like Debian, and 1 point was a complaint about the name. You gave me the point I made about Debian's security, and you complained about the amount of dev packages. I didn't put down Arch, I was stymied by your wish for derivatives of it.
I like Debian, and if you like Arch, then use Arch, but why would you want derivatives of it? All of the derivatives of Debian try to make it easier to use, hell, that's why I use Xubuntu on my laptop, because I am too lazy to configure the wireless card on my crappy dell. But it loses something in the derivation process, and I would think Arch would too.
I use Debian on my desktop because I think it kicks ass, none of it's derivatives really do, so I don't use them on my desktop.
Use the real thing. Be glad it exists, but don't put me down for my preferences, we're both Linux users.