Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Nov 2011 22:07 UTC, submitted by Nooone

Permalink for comment 498476
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2010-04-24
... because, it doesn't "fork" the desktop the way Unity does (completely different look'n'feel, new specific APIs etc.).
As far as I'm concerned, it made me realize I could get used and actually enjoy the plain Gnome Shell desktop. Only had to disable the Mint extensions and switch to the default theme.
When you think about it, Gnome 3 is not such a mess. Only two releases so far and it's almost perfectly stable IMHO. KDE 4.x took much longer, and Unity is definitely not there yet.
My main complaint is : TOO MANY choices.
Regarding the distro choice... Arch is often refered to. It's indeed good, I've used it for years and always ended up giving up because of the rolling-release-state-of-the-art-model : there are always regressions and things not working properly.
I mean : who cares if it's not extremely recent or extremely good looking : it has to be stable first, this is the most important thing.