Linked by David Adams on Wed 30th Nov 2011 20:18 UTC, submitted by Oren
Permalink for comment 498528
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-07-15
Couldn't agree more. All of these manufacturer and carrier-specific Android roms are a headache. It puts me in mind of the days of Windows Mobile (ugh!!!!) when there were so many slightly different versions of that beast, all with their individual quirks. That is, I've found, an inevitable downside to free software. Fragmentation is a given. Hopefully, Google's more strict requirements for their approval (which most manufacturers do care about, for the Android market if nothing else) will at least curb this excess of fragmentation. I doubt we'll ever be entirely rid of it however.