Linked by David Adams on Wed 30th Nov 2011 20:15 UTC, submitted by rohan_p
Permalink for comment 498569
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
PCI-E 4.0 has *nothing* to do with tablets.
Neither one will ever come close to pushing sufficient packets and/or pixels to saturate a PCI-E 2.0 4x link (~4GBps FD), let alone a theoretical PCI-E 4.0 16x link (~64GBps FD).
Heck, even a high-end Xeon EX (w/ ~100GBps memory bandwidth) will have a hard time saturating multiple PCI-E 4.0 8x and 16x link.
PCI-E 4.0 is designed to tackle 100Gbps networks and high-end GPGPU setups.
- Gilboa
Edited 2011-12-01 11:48 UTC