Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Dec 2011 18:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 498998
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-05-17
I'm wondering if Windows on ARM is going to be worth it for most consumers. The reason most of us use Windows is the legacy - we have a big backlog of software. On an ARM machine, it won't run anyway, so Windows would really be sold on its actual merits... and that's the scary bit for Microsoft!
People certainly don't buy Windows for interface or reliability... or cheapness, or... (I could go on).
In car terms, I guess it's a bit like BMW, Audi, and Mercedes competing in the same small car segment that Toyota, Honda, Mazda, and so on, all have down pat. A scaled-down Mercedes A-Class is expensive, unreliable, and not at all cool. Most of us will take the Japanese makes, and likewise, in the computing world, most of us will take Android or iOS in the small chip segment. I'll take Android.