Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Dec 2011 22:48 UTC
Permalink for comment 499175
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
MIPs has proven to scale. It used to run in high end workstations (64bit even!), and runs in embedded spaces.
The problem of course is fragmentation. MIPs processor features are across the board, partly because the embedded MIPs have scaled back features compared with the SGI days..
ARM has been generally scaling up so there's a general backward compatibility, although there's been fragmentation as well (tegra2 w/o neon is a prime example of that).
It's good to see MIPs has decided to compete with ARM. More choice is good, even if MS isn't targeting it.